And this is shocking?

http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/6149-mumbai-terrorist-was-us-agent

This link leads to a story about US/US agent complicity of some degree or other in the Mumbai massacre. This story seems to confirm a trend of US involvement in less than savory (nice pc speech, eh?) incidents. Another article on this same topic (no link here, apologies) discusses the perception that the US is out for itself and its own agenda, allies be damned. Specifically, the grievance aired dealt with a paucity of intel shared with the Indians, resulting in a possibly preventable loss of life...

Investors.com - Bare Warning

Investors.com - Bare Warning

Ok - so no doubt I am going to sound like a conspiracy theororist here but...they can be right too....right?

So, maybe, just maybe, the only reason these intel bubbas can be so certain that there WILL be a 'terrorist' attack in the next 6 months or so might be because they are the ones pulling the strings to make it happen?

Think about it...how can someone predict with 100% certainty the actions of another, especially if the subject of the prediction is bent on surprising you? Predict publicly 3 to 6 months? Act in 1 month or 7...their guard will be down. Wait a year, the threat of effective counter action may have passed.

So really, the only certainty is contained in the elements that you control. Either there will be an attack in that time frame because it is what the govt wished/enabled to occur or there won't. Either way, the govt 'wins' because, using the justification of an impending terror attack, they can seize ever more power and control...more curtailment of our liberties for the purported benefits of public safety.

On this one, I am throwing the bullshit flag. Either way it goes - attack or no attack - government is controlling the outcome...their level of certainty assures it.